Saturday, May 18, 2013

மாணவிக்கு மாற்றுச் சான்றிதழை தர மறுத்த தனியார் பள்ளி - நஷ்டஈடு வழங்க நுகர்வோர் கோர்ட் உத்தரவு....


மாணவிக்கு மாற்றுச் சான்றிதழை தர மறுத்த தனியார் பள்ளி - நஷ்டஈடு வழங்க நுகர்வோர் கோர்ட் உத்தரவு


பதிவு செய்த நாள்: மே 18, 2013, 05:16 IST

சென்னை: "மாணவிக்கு மாற்றுச் சான்றிதழை தர மறுத்த, தனியார் பள்ளி, பாதிக்கப் பட்டவருக்கு உரிய நஷ்டஈடு வழங்க வேண்டும்' என, நுகர்வோர் கோர்ட் உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது.

சென்னை, வியாசர்பாடியைச் சேர்ந்த ரவி என்பவர், வியாசர்பாடி, டான் பாஸ்கோ பள்ளி நிர்வாகத்திற்கு எதிராக, மாவட்ட நுகர்வோர் கோர்ட்டில் தாக்கல் செய்த மனு:கடந்த, 2007-08ம் கல்வியாண்டில், என் மகள் ரம்யா மற்றும் ஜெகன், எதிர் மனுதாரர் பள்ளியில், முறையே, மூன்றாம் வகுப்பு மற்றும் ஆறாம் வகுப்பு படித்து வந்தனர்.

தண்டனை என்ற பெயரில், 2007 மார்ச், 28ம் தேதி முதல், ஏப்ரல், 4ம் தேதி வரை, ரம்யாவை, இருட்டறையில் சிறை வைத்தனர். இதுதொடர்பாக, முதல்வர் தனிப் பிரிவு, கல்வித் துறை அதிகாரி மற்றும் மனித உரிமைகள் அமைப்பில் புகார் செய்யப்பட்டது.இச்சம்பவம் குறித்து, உதவி கல்வி அலுவலர் விசாரணை நடத்தினார். பின், பள்ளி நிர்வாகத்துடன் சமாதானம் ஏற்பட்டதையடுத்து, ரம்யாவை மட்டும் பள்ளியில் சேர்த்துக் கொள்ள, ஒப்புக் கொண்டனர். அவளை பள்ளியில் அனுமதித்த பின், திடீரென பள்ளியை விட்டு வெளியேற சொன்னதுடன், மாற்றுச் சான்றிதழையும் தர மறுத்தனர்.இவ்வாறு மனுவில் தெரிவிக்கப்பட்டுள்ளது.

மனுவை விசாரித்த, சென்னை (வடக்கு) நுகர்வோர் கோர்ட், சம்பந்தப்பட்ட பள்ளி நிர்வாகத்தின் செயல்பாட்டை சேவை குறைபாடாக கருதி, பாதிக்கப்பட்ட மனுதாரருக்கு, 50 ஆயிரம் ரூபாய் நஷ்டஈடு வழங்க உத்தரவிட்டது.இந்த உத்தரவை எதிர்த்து, பள்ளி நிர்வாகம், மாநில நுகர்வோர் கோர்ட்டில் தாக்கல் செய்த மேல்முறையீட்டு மனுவில், "எதிர்மனுதாரர், தன் விருப்பப்படியே, அவரின் மகள் ரம்யாவை பள்ளியை விட்டு நிறுத்தினார். அவருக்கு, மாற்றுச் சான்றிதழ் உடனடியாக வழங்கப்பட்டது. எதிர்மனுதாரர், பள்ளி நற்பெயரை கெடுக்கும் வகையில் செயல்பட்டுள்ளதால், மாவட்ட நுகர்வோர் கோர்ட்டின் தீர்ப்பை ரத்து செய்ய வேண்டும்' என, தெரிவிக்கப்பட்டுள்ளது.

மனுவை விசாரித்த, மாநில நுகர்வோர் கோர்ட் நீதிபதி ரகுபதி, உறுப்பினர் சம்பந்தம் ஆகியோர் பிறப்பித்துள்ள உத்தரவு: ஜெகன், சம்பந்தப்பட்ட பள்ளி நிர்வாகம் மீது கூறிய குற்றச்சாட்டை ஏற்க முடியாது. ஆனால், மாவட்ட நுகர்வோர் கோர்ட்டின் உத்தரவிற்கு பிறகே, அவரின் மகள் ரம்யாவின் மாற்றுச் சான்றிதழை அளித்துள்ளனர். எனவே, மாவட்ட நுகர்வோர் கோர்ட் தீர்ப்பை முற்றிலும் ரத்து செய்ய முடியாது. சம்பந்தப்பட்ட பள்ளி நிர்வாகம், எதிர்மனுதாரருக்கு, 25 ஆயிரம் ரூபாய் நஷ்டஈடு வழங்க வேண்டும். இவ்வாறு உத்தரவில் தெரிவிக்கப்பட்டுள்ளது.

Courtesy_



THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

BEFORE

Hon’ble Thiru Justice R. REGUPATHI - PRESIDENT
Thiru.S. SAMBANDAM - MEMBER II

F.A.NO.261/2011
(Against order in C.C.NO.41/2008 on the file of the DCDRF, Chennai (North)

DATED THIS THE 29th DAY OF APRIL 2013      

1. Don Bosco School, Vysarpadi, Chennai- 600 039, rep. by its Headmaster

2. Don Bosco School, Vysarpadi, Chennai – 600 039, rep. by its Correspondent                                             

M/s. K. Baskar - Counsel for Appellants / Opposite parties

 Vs.

1. Minor R. Ramya
2. Minor R. Gegan
rep. by their father and natural guardian R.G.Ravi, No.409-C. Kalyanpuram, Vysarpadi, Chennai- 600 039

M/s. V. Balaji - Counsel for Respondents/ Complainants

The Respondent as complainant filed a complaint before the District Forum against the opposite parties praying for certain direction. The District Forum allowed the complaint. Against the said order, this appeal is preferred praying to set aside the order of the District Forum dt.25.11.2008 in CC. No.41/2008.

          This petition coming before us for hearing finally on 05.04.2013.  Upon hearing the arguments of the counsels on bothsides, perusing the documents, lower court records, and the order passed by the District Forum, this commission made the following order:

JUSTICE R. REGUPATHI,  PRESIDENT   

1.          The opposite parties aggrieved against the order passed by the District Forum, preferred the present appeal. 

2.       The case of the complainant is that their two children by name Ramya and Jegan, studying in 3rd standard and 6th standard respectively, in the school of the opposite parties.  During the academic year 2007-2008, it is alleged that the children were harassed by the teaching staff of the opposite parties, by inflicting severe punishment, especially against one of the child Ramya, by confining her in a dark room from 28.3.2007 to 4.4.2007.  A complaint was given to the education authority, Human Rights Organisation and Chief Minister’s Cell.  An enquiry was conducted by AEO, and in the presence of an advocate appointed by the Legal Aid, a compromise was entered into between the complainant and the School authorities, and the dispute was solved.  However, they have agreed to admit Minor Ramya into school and refused to give admission to Jegan, and even in so far as the child Ramya is concerned, after allowing her to attend the school, sent her out and refused to give the Transfer Certificate, resulting in the complaint before the District Forum. 

3.       The opposite parties denied the allegations of the complainant, and it was only the complainant who precipitated the issue for reprimanding the children for their wrong doing, and the complaint itself is not maintainable. 

4.       The District Forum, after considering the rival contentions, came to the conclusion that there is deficiency in service on the part of the opposite party, and allowed the complaint directing the opposite parties to pay Rs.50000/- as compensation and Rs.2000/- as cost.

5.       The learned counsel for appellant submitted that they are running a Government aided school and they do not charge fee upto 5th standard, and their teachers never ill-treated at any point of time, and infact the allegation given by the complainant has been withdrawn and the dispute has been compromised.  It is further contended that they have not collected any fees from the second child, and he was not at all studying for the subsequent academic year.  Even the child Ramya voluntarily stopped attending the school, and when the transfer certificate was demanded, it was immediately given.  It is further submitted that the order of compensation and cost is too heavy, and since the complainant has approach the media, the name of the school is damaged in the eye of public, and the school has not committed any deficiency, the order impugned may be set aside. 

6.       Per contra, the learned counsel for the respondent/ complainant submitted that admittedly both children were studying in the school of the opposite party, and the complainant being the father of the children, normally will not throw baseless allegations and submitted that even in the letter of withdrawal of the complaint, it has been specifically mentioned, and contended that such withdrawal was done, in view of the apology tendered by the school authorities.   The opposite parties though admitted the first child, refused to allow her to continue her studies and failed to admit his son, and Transfer Certificate of Ramya itself was given to the complainant, only on the direction issued by the District Forum, and under such circumstances the allegation made by the complainant is substantiated.  Hence the appeal is liable to be dismissed. 

7.       We have heard the arguments advanced by both parties, perused the materials on record, and the order impugned. 

8.       Admittedly, both the children of the complainant were studying in the school of the opposite party in the academic year 2007-2008.  A complaint was given to the AEO and other authorities, and the complainant sought the help of Tamil Nadu State Legal Service Authorities. A compromise was effected by the AEO and as per Ex.A4 and A5 dt.13.7.2007, the complainant has withdrawn the allegation by specifically stating that such harassment shall not be repeated to the children, By letter dt.25.7.2007 Ex.A7, addressed to the Tamil Nadu Legal Service Authorities, it has been mentioned by the complainant while thanking the service rendered, stated that the first child has been admitted in the school and such an admission has been refused for the second child and made a request that the school authorities/ opposite parties may be persuaded to admit the second child also.  It appears that admittedly the second child was not admitted.   Though the child Ramya was admitted, she could not continue her studies and opposite party referred to give TC, due to someother complications  due to someother complications, resulting in the filing of the complaint and only on the direction issued by the District Forum the transfer certificate was furnished to the child of the complainant.  The contention of the counsel for the appellant that the allegation was withdrawn as compromised without any condition, cannot be accepted.   On perusal of the compromise letter, it appears that such compromise has been reached only on the assurance and apology tendered by the Head Master of the school of the opposite party.  Admittedly, only on the orders issued by the District Forum, the Transfer Certificate of the first child was given to the complainant. On perusal of Ex.A7, letter sent by the complainant to the Legal Service Authorities, it has been specifically stated that the son of the complainant was not at all admitted and sought for the intervention of the legal service authority for such admission.  Therefore  the allegation of the complainant that the opposite party failed to admit the second child after receipt of fees cannot be accepted and the observation made by the District Forum, with regard to the complainant’s second child is hereby set aside.  However, in so far as the first child is concerned, the allegation of the complainant is substantiated.   Hence the appeal is liable to allowed.  In so far as the quantum of compensation is concerned, we are of the considered opinion that the award of compensation of Rs.50000/- is on the higher side, and is restricted to Rs.25000/-. 

9.       In the result, the appeal is allowed in part, modifying the order of the District Forum in CC.No.41/2008 dt.25.11.2008, reducing the compensation to Rs.25000/- instead of Rs.50000/-, otherwise confirming the order.  There will be no order as to cost in this appeal.

R. REGUPATHI - PRESIDENT

S. SAMBANDAM - MEMBER

Courtesy_
                          

No comments:

Post a Comment

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Search our Blog here

Google
 

Compiled by

Disclaimer


This Blog Spot is meant for publishing landmark judgments pronounced by the Court of law as we collected from the renowned Dailies, Magazines, etc., so as to create an awareness to the general public and also to keep it as a ready reckoner by them. As such the readers may extend their gratitude towards the Original Author as we quoted at the bottom of each Post under the title "Courtesy/Sources". Furthermore, the Blog Authors are no way responsible for the correctness of the materials published herein and the readers may verify the concerned valuable sources.



Followers

Dinamalar | Court News Feed

Dinakaran | Crime News Feed

Labels

Madras High Court (226) supreme court (157) Supreme Court (96) Madurai Bench (60) Advocate (44) High Court (44) tamil nadu (42) Indian Kanoon (41) Delhi High Court (37) Education (31) Divorce (30) Pondicherry (30) Husband (28) Wife (28) consumer forum (23) Lawyers (22) Cr.P.C. (20) Maintenance (20) police (20) Consumer (19) 2013 (16) Judges (16) article (16) the hindu (16) Matrimonial case (15) Hindu Marriage Act (14) Bank (13) Cruelty (13) IPC (13) karnataka high court (13) AIADMK (12) Compensation (12) Criminal cases (12) Jayalalithaa (12) dmk (12) Bar Council of India (11) CJI (11) School (11) Woman (11) election (11) Accident cases (10) Child (10) Kerala High Court (10) Marriage (10) dinamani (10) election commission (10) insurance (10) medical (10) Labour cases (9) MV ACT CASES (9) Madurai (9) Mobile Phone (9) doctors (9) evidence (9) pil (9) tamil nadu bar council (9) tax (9) taxation (9) Cell Phone (8) Examination (8) Frontline (8) Loans (8) Magistrate (8) Rent Control Act (8) State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (8) Allahabad high court (7) Bar Council (7) Constitution (7) Domestic Violence Act (7) Gujarat High Court (7) Negligence (7) Reservation Quota (7) Tenant Landlord (7) bombay high court (7) court (7) new delhi (7) 2012 (6) Andhra Pradesh High Court (6) Civil Judge (6) Complaint (6) Consumer National Commission (6) Dowry (6) Employee (6) Justice G. Rajasuria (6) Muslims (6) Negotiable Instruments Act (6) Notification (6) Railway (6) USA (6) arbitration (6) compassionate (6) madras (6) rape (6) rulings (6) sex (6) Airlines (5) Andhra Pradesh (5) College (5) Delay (5) Employer (5) FIR (5) Judgment (5) Karunanidhi (5) Labour Court (5) Madras Family Court (5) Mumbai High Court (5) President (5) Rajiv Gandhi (5) Recruitment (5) Sethusamudram ship canal (5) Student (5) TRAI (5) advertisement (5) appointment (5) deficiency of service (5) editorial (5) fined (5) 2014 (4) BSNL (4) Bigamy (4) CBI (4) Cheque Dishonour Cases (4) Chief Minister of Pondicherry (4) Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu (4) Civil Matters (4) Commissioner of Police (4) Corruption (4) Daughter (4) Death penalty (4) Father (4) Fees (4) Foreigners Act (4) Gazette (4) Hindu (4) Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act (4) Hospitals (4) Judiciary (4) Justice G.Rajasuria (4) Life Imprisonment (4) Matrimonial House (4) Ministry of Law (4) Minor Child (4) Parents (4) Private Schools (4) RTI Act (4) Ram Sethu project (4) Sexual exploitation (4) Suspension (4) Teachers (4) Tenant (4) Transfer (4) contempt (4) delhi (4) hindustan times (4) karnataka (4) pmk (4) registration department (4) times of india (4) us (4) Actor (3) Adoption (3) Aircraft (3) Assassination (3) Ban (3) Bank Cases (3) CJ (3) Calcutta High Court (3) Cheque (3) Computer (3) Copyright (3) Court Fees (3) Dinakaran (3) Disqualification (3) Electricity (3) Encroachers (3) Eviction (3) Full Bench Decision (3) HC Advocate Karunanidhi.R (3) Human Rights (3) Human Rights Commission (3) IT Act (3) Income Tax (3) Justice Ashok Kumar (3) Landlord (3) Law Firms (3) Limitation Act (3) Medicos (3) Motor Vehicle (3) Murder case (3) Muslim (3) NDNC (3) Panchayats Act (3) Patent (3) Prisoner (3) Proterty Act (3) Public Property (3) Punishment (3) RTE Act (3) Ragging (3) Salaries (3) Selection (3) Smoking (3) Strikes (3) Subramanian Swamy (3) Telephone (3) Theft (3) Villupuram (3) Websites (3) Wikipedia (3) Witness (3) Woman Lawyers (3) Workman (3) Youtube (3) girl (3) helmet (3) parliament (3) software (3) stamp act (3) 2007 (2) 5-Judges Bench (2) 99th Constitutional Amendment (2) Aadhaar Card (2) Abortion (2) Absence (2) Acquittal (2) Agitating (2) Agriculture (2) Airport (2) Airtel (2) Amendments (2) Apple (2) Arrest (2) Assault (2) BCCI (2) BCI (2) Britain (2) CBSE (2) CIC (2) CNN IBN (2) CPC (2) CTC (2) Chenai Corporation (2) Child Marriage Act (2) Child Witness (2) Cigarette (2) Citizenship (2) Code of Civil procedure (2) Coimbatore (2) Collector (2) Collegium systems (2) Companies Act (2) Complainant (2) Congress (2) Constitution Bench (2) Cr.P.C (2) Credit Card (2) DNA Test (2) Damages (2) Date of Birth (2) Dayanidhi Maran (2) District Judges (2) Driving Licence (2) Drugs (2) EVMs (2) Enrolment (2) Evening Court (2) Exam Marks (2) Eye-witness (2) Family (2) Family Court (2) Foreign Law Firms (2) Freedom Fighters (2) Fundamental Rights (2) Google (2) Governors (2) Grave crimes (2) Habeas Corpus (2) Haldiram (2) Health Ministry (2) High Courts (2) Himachal Pradesh High Court (2) ICICI (2) ID Act (2) Impeachment (2) Inspector General of Registration (2) Inter-caste (2) Interest (2) Interim Injunction (2) Interim Orders (2) International Arbitration (2) International Court of Justice (2) Internet (2) Job (2) Justice (2) Justice A.K.Ganguly (2) Justice Dinakaran (2) LPG (2) LTTE (2) Law Commission (2) Law Department (2) Lok Adalat (2) MPs (2) Madhya Pradesh High Court (2) Maharashtra (2) Mark Sheets (2) Medi-claim (2) Men (2) Microsoft (2) Municipal Post (2) Municipal Waste (2) Municipality (2) NJAC (2) Nagapattinam (2) Nalini (2) National Highways (2) Nuke Deal (2) Obscenity (2) PTI (2) Patient (2) Patna High Court (2) Penalty (2) Pension (2) Police Reforms Committee (2) Poll freebies (2) Power of Attorney (2) Pregnant (2) Prevention of Corruption Act (2) Prime Minister (2) Property (2) Public Meetings (2) Punjab High Court (2) Punjab and Haryana High Court (2) RBI (2) Registrar (2) Registration Act (2) Release (2) Reserve Bank of India (2) Retired benefits (2) Review (2) Rigorous imprisonment (2) Road (2) SBI (2) SC/ST (2) SHRC (2) Sale (2) Samacheer Kalvi (2) Sanjay Dutt (2) Self-defence (2) Sikkim (2) Sonia Gandhi (2) State Bar Concil (2) State Govts. (2) TADA (2) TNEB (2) Tamil New Year Act (2) Temples (2) Tobacco firms (2) Trafficking (2) University (2) Video (2) Vigilance (2) Vodafone (2) Wages (2) Water (2) West Bengal (2) Woman Judges (2) backlog of cases (2) bail (2) customs duty (2) laptops (2) legislature (2) practitioners (2) service (2) service tax (2) sessions judge (2) tiruchi (2) 100 RUPEE (1) 11 weeks imprisonment (1) 18 Years (1) 2001 (1) 2006 (1) 2009 (1) 2011 (1) 2015 (1) 2016 (1) 5 Judges Bench (1) 6th Pay Scale (1) AIIMS (1) Aadal Paadal (1) Aadhar Card (1) Abuse (1) Accountable (1) Act (1) Adjournments (1) Adverse possession (1) Advocate Cyril Mathias Vincent (1) Advocate M.Kumaran (1) Advocate M.S.Maruthupandiyan (1) Advocate P.S.Amalraj (1) Advocates' Welfare Fund Act (1) Agreement (1) Air India (1) Alien Species (1) Allahabad (1) Allergy (1) Allopathy (1) Amusement parks (1) Anbumani Ramadoss (1) Answer Sheets (1) Apartments (1) Appearance (1) Arguments (1) Arrears (1) Arunachal Pradesh (1) Ashok Kumar (1) Assembly Speaker (1) Assets case (1) Association (1) Attendance (1) Attention Please (1) Auditors (1) Australia (1) Autopsy (1) Ayodhya (1) BJP (1) Babri Masjid (1) Baby (1) Baggage missing (1) Bank Account (1) Banners (1) Bar Association (1) Bar Council of Tamil Nadu (1) Batco Roadways' case (1) Bhavani Singh (1) Bhopal gas tragedy (1) Bhullar's mercy plea (1) Big TV (1) Bihar (1) Bihar Prohibition Act (1) Bill (1) Biscuits (1) Black Sea (1) Bofors case (1) Bonus (1) Boycott (1) Brain-mapping (1) Brothers (1) Burqa (1) Buses (1) Business Line (1) Bye-laws (1) CAT (1) CEC (1) CITY CIVIL COURT (1) CTV (1) Calcutta (1) Cambodian (1) Camera (1) Canada (1) Cargo Ship (1) Caste (1) Cauvery (1) Cauvery Tribunal Award (1) Censor Board (1) Central Crime Branch (1) Certificates (1) Chennai (South) Forum (1) Chhattisgarh State Bar Council (1) Chief Judicial Magistrate (1) Chief Justices of India (1) Christian (1) Civic Election (1) Civic Elections (1) Common facilities Block (1) Commonwealth Games Panel (1) Communal harmony (1) Compounding Offences (1) Condoms (1) Contract labour (1) Conversion Formula (1) Cooperative Societies (1) Copying (1) Corporation (1) Cosmetic (1) Costumes (1) Court Buildings (1) Creche (1) Cricket (1) Criminalisation (1) Culcutta High Court (1) Current Tamil Nadu Cases (1) Custodial death (1) DGP (1) DK (1) DMDK (1) DRT (1) Dalits (1) Dasavatharam (1) Daughter-in-law (1) Death (1) Debarring (1) Deccan (1) Defamation (1) Defaulters (1) Degree (1) Departmental Enquiry (1) Derogatory remarks (1) Desertion (1) Designation (1) Destruction (1) Detergent Soap (1) Dharmapuri (1) Directory (1) Disabled person (1) Disconnection (1) Dispensary (1) Don Bosco Matriculation School (1) Don Bosco School (1) Download Links (1) Dozing (1) Dr.Ramadoss (1) Dress Code (1) Driver (1) Drunk driving (1) Dying Declaration (1) EPIC (1) ESI Act (1) EU (1) Education Department (1) Education Loan (1) Elevation (1) Emergency (1) Employment (1) Engineering College (1) Enquiry (1) Entertainment tax (1) Environment (1) European Court (1) Events to Remember (1) Exam Cheaters (1) Exit Polls (1) Experts Committee (1) Expulsion (1) Facebook (1) Fair Criticism (1) False (1) Fat (1) Father's identity (1) Father-in-law (1) Film (1) Fire (1) Flats (1) Flexi Boards (1) Food (1) Framing of Charges (1) France (1) French Civil Code (1) French Regime (1) Fringe Benefit Tax (1) Frivolous Petition (1) GOs (1) Garments (1) Gauhati HC (1) Gender Bias (1) Gingee Court (1) Gingee-TV Malai NH (1) Girlfriend (1) Goa (1) Gondas (1) Goods (1) Goons (1) Government Offices (1) Government Officials (1) Govt. Servants' Conduct Rules (1) Govt. sites (1) Grandchildren (1) Gratuity (1) Green Card (1) Guardian (1) Gubernatorial (1) Gudalur Janmam Estates (1) Guidelines (1) Guilty (1) HC Calendar (1) HIV Patient (1) HRCE Act (1) Hamam Soap (1) Handcuff (1) Haryana (1) Hawkers (1) Heroin (1) Hewlett Packard (1) High Court Bench for Pondicherry (1) Highways (1) Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment (1) Hindu Succession Act (1) Hindus (1) Hindustan Lever Limited (1) Hindustan Unilever Limited (1) Hoardings (1) Holiday Court (1) Holidays (1) Hostel (1) Hutchison Essar (1) Hyderabad (1) ICJ (1) ICSE (1) IMDT Act (1) IPL (1) IT Tax Tribunal (1) Identity Cards (1) Illegitimate (1) Images (1) Immoral (1) Impotent (1) Imprisonment (1) Incest (1) Infiltrators (1) Interest rates (1) Interview (1) Invalid (1) Investigation (1) Invitation (1) Jammu and Kashmir (1) Jats Reservation (1) Jharkhand (1) Journal Section (1) Judicial Discretion (1) Judicial Officers (1) Judicial Staffs (1) Junction (1) Justice A.P.Shah (1) Justice Bhagwati (1) Justice F.M.Ibrahim Kalifulla (1) Justice G Rajasuriya (1) Justice P.Sathasivam (1) Justice Rajasuriya (1) Juvenile Justice Board (1) K.R.Narayanan (1) K.Veeramani (1) KFC (1) Kabil Sibal (1) Kachatheevu (1) Karaikal (1) Katchativu case (1) Kathi (1) Kerala (1) Kerla (1) Khushboo (1) Kidney (1) Kingfisher (1) Kodak (1) LIC (1) Lakes (1) Land Owners (1) Larger Bench (1) Laundry (1) Law College (1) Lawyer Notice (1) Leave (1) Legal Practitioners Act 2010 (1) Leprosy Patient (1) License Fees (1) Lift (1) Links (1) Live-in-relationship (1) Local Bodies (1) Lok Sabha (1) MCOCA (1) MLAs (1) MNC (1) Malaria (1) Malaysian Airlines (1) Malpractice (1) Mangalore Express (1) Manupatra (1) Marriage Registration Certificates (1) Married (1) Mediation (1) Medical College issue (1) Meghalaya (1) Mercy Petition (1) Mizoram (1) Mobile Court (1) Money Lending licence (1) Mosquito Bite (1) Mother (1) Movies (1) Mutual Consent (1) NDPS Act (1) NDTV (1) NH 31A (1) NHRCs (1) NI Act (1) NOTA (1) NPT (1) NRI (1) NSA Act (1) Nagaland (1) Nallathambi (1) Narco Analysis (1) National Taxation Tribunal (1) Natural Justice (1) Navarasu murder case (1) Negative Voting (1) Nepal (1) News Today (1) Nivedita Sharma (1) No-confidence motion (1) Non-Karnataka Vehicles (1) Non-signatory (1) None of the Above (1) Norms (1) North Carolina (1) Notary Public (1) Notifications (1) Nursing College (1) Office Bearers (1) Official Language (1) Oil Companies (1) Online (1) Oral (1) Ordinance (1) Origin (1) Orissa High Court (1) PBA (1) PD Act (1) PEC (1) PF (1) PHCs (1) PIB (1) PNDT Act (1) PTO (1) Panorama view (1) Parle Marie (1) Partnership (1) Paternity (1) Patta (1) Pending case (1) Pondicherry Code (1) Pondicherry Courts (1) Pondicherry Engineering College (1) Pondicherry University (1) Port (1) Possession (1) Post Office (1) Posters (1) Postmortem (1) Power (1) Prabha Sridevan (1) Preamble (1) Premarital sex (1) Press Trust of India (1) Prestige (1) Presumption of Death (1) Prisoners (1) Private (1) Private Defence (1) Prize Draw Contest (1) Profession (1) Profile (1) Promotion (1) Prosecution (1) Protest (1) Provident Fund (1) Public Prosecutor (1) Puducherry Code (1) Pulipaarvai (1) Quash (1) Quattrocchi (1) Quick Links (1) RCOP (1) RDBFI Act (1) RIM (1) RPF (1) Railway Budget (1) Railway Tribunal (1) Railways Act (1) Rajasthan High Court (1) Rajasuria (1) Rajeswari case (1) Rajya Sabha (1) Re-name (1) Recovery (1) Refund (1) Regional SC Bench (1) Registration (1) Regulations (1) Reinstatement (1) Relatives (1) Reliance (1) Religion (1) Religious Functions (1) Remanding (1) Removal (1) Rename (1) Repeal of Local Laws (1) Resident (1) Respondent (1) Retired Judges (1) Retired Staffs (1) Revaluation (1) Rexona Soap (1) Right to Information Act (1) Right to Sleep (1) Rin (1) Romania (1) Rural (1) SMS (1) SPP (1) Sachar Commission (1) Safai Karamchari Andolan case (1) Sanction (1) Saree (1) Satta Padhukappu (1) Scam (1) Secretary (1) Section 102 CPC (1) Section 125(3) (1) Section 66A (1) Sections 499 and 500 (1) Security (1) Senior Advocate (1) Septic Tank (1) Serials (1) Service matters (1) Settlement (1) Sewerage works (1) Shankaracharya case (1) Sheristadar (1) Ship (1) Shivaji Ganesan Statue (1) Sivaji Ganesan Statue (1) Sleeping (1) Soap (1) Son (1) Special Marriages Act (1) Sri Lanka (1) Sri Lanka Supreme Court (1) Sri Meenakshi Sundareswarar Temple (1) Suicide (1) Sukanya (1) Surgery (1) Syllabus (1) TNPSC (1) TV (1) Tamil Links (1) Telecom (1) Telegraph Act (1) Thanthai Periyar (1) Third Party (1) Thirukural (1) Thirunelveli (1) Ticket Bookings (1) Ticket less Journey (1) Tide (1) Time-barred matters (1) Title suit (1) Toronto (1) Trademarks (1) Traffic (1) Transfer Certificate (1) Transport Authority (1) Travels Agent (1) Trees (1) Tripurar (1) Turban law (1) USE Act (1) Ukraine (1) Unauthorised layouts (1) Unauthorised plots (1) Unconstitutional (1) Union Carbide Corporation (1) Union Minister (1) Universities (1) Unruly Advocates (1) Unwed mother (1) Uttarakhand (1) Uttaranchal (1) VAO (1) VRS (1) Vacuum Cleaner (1) Vakalat (1) Vaseline (1) Verbal (1) Video Poker (1) Video-conferencing (1) Vijayakant (1) Visa (1) Voters (1) Voting (1) Wakf (1) Watchman (1) Who's Who (1) Widow (1) Will (1) Word (1) Workmen Compensation Act (1) Wrong Provision (1) Yahoo (1) architects (1) azhagiri (1) british airways (1) churidar (1) deccan herald (1) delh (1) double taxation (1) e-Library (1) eBay (1) eCourt (1) ebc (1) farmers loan waiver (1) germany citizen (1) guideline value (1) guruvayur devaswom (1) hMatrimonial case (1) india (1) law and order (1) nawaz sharif (1) pakistan (1) pakistan supreme court (1) practical lawyer (1) pratiba (1) promise (1) rules (1) sand mining (1) southern districts (1) uk (1) warrants for cash scam (1) தி இந்து (1) தூக்கம் (1)